ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1984
 
Oil Shale cover
Oil Shale
ISSN 1736-7492 (Electronic)
ISSN 0208-189X (Print)
Impact Factor (2022): 1.9
OIL SHALE PULVERIZED FIRING: BOILER EFFICIENCY, ASH BALANCE AND FLUE GAS COMPOSITION; pp. 6–18
PDF | doi: 10.3176/oil.2013.1.02

Authors
ALAR KONIST, TÕNU PIHU, Dmitri Neshumayev, ANDRES SIIRDE
Abstract

The paper presents analyses of data obtained from oil shale pulverized firing tests carried out at the Eesti Power Plant (EPP) that is part of an Estonian power company Narva Power Plants (NPP) owned by a state company Eesti Energia AS. The tests were conducted at two boiler loads: 50% (158 t/h) and 100% (320 t/h) in the TP-101 boiler. During experiments samples of bottom and fly ashes from inertia dust collectors after the super heater (SH) and economizer (ECO), as well as fly ash from the electrostatic precipitator (ESP) of the first, second and third fields were taken. Analysis of the gas sample taken at the ESP exit was performed. The ash distribution at different ash discharge ports was obtained. Analysis of the ash chemical composition was carried out. The specific consumption of oil shale per useful heat and gross electricity production was found and other techno-economic characteristics were determined. The tests at partial and nominal loads showed that the emission of SO2, CO2, CO, NO and HCl at nominal load were essentially higher. The content of fine ash particles (<2.5 µm) after the ESP was higher at nominal load.
   Results of analysis can serve as a basis for future research and develop­ment projects. Also, they can be used to decide whether to continue operation of PF units.

References

  1. Siirde, A. Oil shale – Global solution or part of the problem? Oil Shale, 2008, 25(2), 201–202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/oil.2008.2.01

  2. Arro, H., Loosaar, J., Ots, A., Pihu, T., Prikk, A., Rusheljuk, P., Hiltunen, M., Hotta, A., Parkkonen, R., Peltola, K. Firing Estonian oil shale in CFB boilers. In Proc. 19th FBC Conference, May 21–24, 2006, Vienna, Austria, Part II.

  3. Arro, H., Prikk, A., Pihu, T. Calculation of CO2 emission from CFB boilers of oil shale power plants. Oil Shale, 2006, 23(4), 356–365.

  4. Arro, H., Prikk, A., Pihu, T. Combustion of Estonian oil shale in fluidized bed boilers, heating value of fuel, boiler efficiency and CO2 emissions. Oil Shale, 2005, 22(4S), 399–406.

  5. Arro, H., Pihu, T., Prikk, A., Rootamm, R., Konist, A. Comparison of ash from PF and CFB boilers and behaviour of ash in ash fields. In Proc. 20th Inter­national Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, May 18–20, 2009, Xian City, China, 2010, Part 7, 1054–1060.

  6. Hotta, A., Parkkonen, R., Hiltunen, M., Arro, H., Loosaar, J., Parve, T., Pihu, T., Prikk, A., Tiikma, T. Experience of Estonian oil shale combustion based on CFB technology at Narva Power Plants. Oil Shale, 2005, 22(4S), 381–398.

  7. Neshumayev, D., Ots, A., Parve, T., Pihu, T., Plamus, K., Prikk, A. Combustion of Baltic oil shales in boilers with fluidized bed combustion. Power Technology and Engineering, 2011, 44(5), 382–385.

  8. Parve, T., Loosaar, J., Mahhov, M., Konist, A. Emission of fine particulates from oil shale fired large boilers. Oil Shale, 2011, 28(1S), 152–161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/oil.2011.1S.07

  9. Pihu, T., Arro, H., Prikk, A., Rootamm, R., Konist, A. Corrosion of air pre­heater tubes of oil shale CFB boiler. Part I. Dew point of flue gas and low-temperature corrosion. Oil Shale, 2009, 26(1), 5–12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/oil.2009.1.01

Back to Issue