headerpos: 9513
 
 
  Oil Shale

ISSN 1736-7492 (electronic)  ISSN 0208-189X (print)
Published since 1984

Oil Shale

ISSN 1736-7492 (electronic)  ISSN 0208-189X (print)
Published since 1984

Publisher
Journal Information
» Editorial Policy
» Editorial Board
Extra
Guidelines for Authors
» For Authors
» Instructions to Authors
» Copyright Transfer Form
Guidelines for Reviewers
» For Reviewers
» Review Form
Subscription Information
Support & Contact
List of Issues
» 2019
Vol. 36, Issue 3
Vol. 36, Issue 2S
Vol. 36, Issue 2
Vol. 36, Issue 1
» 2018
» 2017
» 2016
» 2015
» 2014
» 2013
» 2012
» 2011
» 2010
» 2009
» 2008
» Back Issues
» Back issues (full texts)
  in Google
Publisher
» Other journals
» Staff

Combustion reaction kinetics of char from in-situ or ex-situ pyrolysis of oil shale; pp. 392–409

(Full article in PDF format) https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2019.3.03


Authors

Qin Hong, Zhou Lei, Zhang Lidong, Liu Hongpeng, Jia Chunxia, Wang Qing, Chen Meiduan

Abstract

Shale oil sludge is a hazardous by-product of hydrocarbon production that needs an effective and safe degradation. Co-pyrolysis with oil shale is a promising method to efficiently render the sludge non-toxic. Pyrolysis of the mixture of oil shale and shale oil sludge was studied using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA). The synergistic pyrolysis parameters were calculated using the coefficient of mutual influence f and the relative error of the root mean square (RMS). Experiments on co-pyrolysis were conducted through measuring the gaseous product and semi-coke by using an infrared (IR) analyzer, a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) and a specific surface area (SSA) analyzer separately. Pyrolysis kinetics was obtained by the Coats-Redfern (CR) method. The synergistic analysis showed the increasing sludge content to advance the pyrolysis of the mixed sample during the process. The surface morphology and amount of micropores of the mixture varied with increasing sludge proportion. The activation energy (E) of the mixture was gradually reduced with the degree of the reaction, while it slowly increased as the reaction proceeded to third stage and the frequency factor gradually decreased with the depth of the reaction. Therefore, the co-pyrolysis had an optimum reaction temperature interval and the degree of reaction was related to the chemical reaction between the reactants.

Keywords

shale oil sludge, co-pyrolysis kinetics, synergy, specific surface area, activation energy.

References

1.       Hou , X. L. Shale Oil Industry of China. Petroleum Industry Press , Beijing , 1984 (in Chinese).

2.       Peng , X. , Ma , X. , Lin , Y. , Guo , Z. , Hu , S. , Ning , X. , Cao , Y. , Zhang , Y. Co-pyrolysis between microalgae and textile dyeing sludge by TG–FTIR: Kinetics and products. Energ. Convers. Manage. , 2015 , 100 , 391−402.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.025

3.       Bičáková , O. , Straka , P. Co-pyrolysis of waste tire/coal mixtures for smokeless fuel , maltenes and hydrogen-rich gas production. Energ. Convers. Manage. , 2016 , 116 , 203−213.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.069

4.       Bozkurt , P. A. , Tosun , O. , Canel , M. The synergistic effect of co-pyrolysis of oil shale and low density polyethylene mixtures and characterization of pyrolysis liquid. J. Energy Inst. , 2017 , 90(3) , 355−362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.04.007

5.       Lin , Y. , Liao , Y. , Yu , Z. , Fang , S. , Lin , Y. , Fan , Y. , Peng , X. , Ma , X. Co-pyrolysis kinetics of sewage sludge and oil shale thermal decomposition using TGA–FTIR analysis. Energ. Convers. Manage. , 2016 , 118 , 345−352.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.004

6.       Bai , J. , Shao , J. , Li , M. , Jia , C. , Wang , Q. Co-pyrolysis characteristic and dynamic analysis of alkali lignin and oil shale. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2016 , 32(7) , 187−193.

7.       Liu , X. R. , Lü , Q. G. , Jiao , W. H. Thermogravimetric analysis of co-
pyrolysis of coal with different municipal sewage sludge. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. , 2011 , 39(3) , 8−13.

8.       Huang , Y. F. , Shih , C. H. , Chiueh , P. T. , Lo , S. L. Microwave co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice straw. Energy , 2015 , 87 , 638−644.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.039

9.       Martínez , J. D. , Veses , A. , Mastral , A. M. , Murillo , R. , Navarro , M. V. , Puy , N. , Artigues , A. , Bartroli , J. , Garcia , T. Co-pyrolysis of biomass with waste tyres: Upgrading of liquid bio-fuel. Fuel Process. Technol. , 2014 , 119 , 263−271.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.11.015

10.   Ding , H. S. , Jiang , H. Self-heating co-pyrolysis of excessive activated sludge with waste biomass: energy balance and sludge reduction. Bio-resource Technol. , 2013 , 133 , 16−22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2013.771866

11.   ÖzverenU. , ÖzdoğanZS. Investigation of the slow pyrolysis kinetics of olive oil pomace using thermo-gravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectrometry. Biomass Bioener. , 2013 , 58 , 168−179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.011

12.    Hilten , R. N. , Vandenbrink , J. P. , Paterson , A. H. , Feltus , F. A. , Das , K. C. Linking isoconversional pyrolysis kinetics to compositional characteristics for multiple Sorghum bicolor genotypes. Thermochim. Acta , 2014 , 577 , 46−52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2013.12.012

13.    Jiang , Z. , Liu , Z. , Fei , B. , Cai , Z. , Yu , Y. , Liu , X. The pyrolysis characteristics of moso bamboo. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. , 2012 , 94 , 48−52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.10.010

14.    Mu , L. , Chen , J. , Yin , H. , Song , X. , Li , A. , Chi , X. Pyrolysis behaviors and kinetics of refining and chemicals wastewater , lignite and their blends through TGA. Bioresource Technol. , 2015 , 180 , 22−31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.090

15.    Ma , B. , Sun , B. Pyrolysis mechanism of shale oil sludge under linear heating temperature. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress , 2013 , 7–13 (in Chinese).

16.    Linder , G. , Andersson , L. A. , Bjerle , I. Influence of heating rate on the pyrolysis of oil shale. Fuel Process. Technol. , 1983 , 8(1) , 19−31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3820(83)90013-9

17.    Charland , J.-P. , MacPhee , J. A. , Giroux , L. , Price , J. T. , Khan , M. A. Application of TG-FTIR to the determination of oxygen content of coals. Fuel Process. Technol. , 2003 , 81(3) , 211−221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00026-2

18.    Wang , Q. , Wang , R. , Jia , C. , Ren , L. , Yan , Y. FG-DVC model for oil shale pyro-lysis. CIESC Journal , 2014 , 65(6) , 2308−2315 (in Chinese , summary in English).

19.    Zhao , L. , Guo , H. , Ma , Q. Study on gaseous products distributions during coal pyrolysis. Coal Conversion , 2007 , 30(1) , 5−9.

20.    Ma , B. Study on the Pyrolysis Properties of Shale Oil Sludge. PhD Dissertation , Northeast Dianli University , 2013.

21.    Schrodt , J. T. , Ocampo , A. Variations in the pore structure of oil shales during retorting and combustion. Fuel , 1984 , 63(11) , 1523−1527.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(84)90219-9

22.    Qi , H. , Ma , J. , Wong , P. Adsorption isotherms of fractal surfaces. Colloid. Surface. A. , 2002 , 206(1−3) , 401−407.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00063-8

 
Back

Current Issue: Vol. 36, Issue 3, 2019




Publishing schedule:
No. 1: 20 March
No. 2: 20 June
No. 3: 20 September
No. 4: 20 December